Ohio considering self-defense law changes
Q: I’ve been hearing about “stand-your-ground” laws in the news. What does Ohio law say about using lethal force in a self-defense situation?
A: In Ohio, if you use lethal force in self-defense, you must prove by a “preponderance” (greater weight) of the evidence that you were properly acting in self-defense. Under current law, in order to act in self-defense, you must prove: 1) you were not at fault in creating the situation; 2) you had an honest belief and reasonable grounds to believe that you were in imminent danger of suffering serious physical harm or death, and that the only reasonable way to stop or avoid the attack was to use lethal force; and 3) you did not violate any duty to physically retreat from the situation.
Q: When might I be “at fault in creating the situation”?
A: A court would consider you to be at fault if you created the situation, unnecessarily prolonged it or escalated the amount of force involved.
Q: How does a court decide whether I had reasonable grounds to believe that I was in imminent danger?
A: Whoever is examining your claim of self-defense, “steps into our shoes,” taking into account your age, gender, physical condition, medical condition, training, etc., and looks at the objective facts to determine if you were reasonable in concluding that you were in imminent danger.
Q: Why would I have to prove that the only reasonable way to stop or avoid the attack was to use lethal force?
A: To claim self-defense, you must establish that the only reasonable way you could have stopped or avoided the attack was to use lethal force.
Q: What is the “duty to physically retreat”?
A: Before using lethal force, the law says you must physically retreat from the situation, if you can do so without taking unreasonable risks. However, the law does not require you to physically retreat from your own residence, place of business or vehicle.
Q: What is a “stand-your-ground” law?
A: Typically, “stand your ground” is used to describe a self-defense law that does not require a duty to physically retreat in a threatening situation.
Q: What changes is Ohio considering to its self-defense laws?
A: Ohio legislators are considering House Bill (H.B.) 203, which would entirely remove the duty to try to physically retreat from the situation. The proposed legislation also states, affirmatively, that a person does not have a duty to retreat as long as that person is someplace where they may legally be present. If H.B. 203 passes, you would have to prove, by a “preponderance of the evidence” that, in using lethal force against another person, you were properly acting in self-defense. Specifically, you would have to prove that: 1) you were not at fault in creating the situation; and 2) you had reasonable grounds to believe and an honest belief that you were in imminent danger of suffering serious physical harm or death, and that the only reasonable way to stop or avoid the attack was to use lethal force. If this bill passes, you would no longer have a duty to physically retreat from the situation.
This column was provided by the Ohio State Bar Association (OSBA) and prepared by L. Kenneth Hanson, of counsel at Firestone, Brehm, Wolf, Whitney and Young LLP in Delaware. Articles in this column are intended to provide broad, general information about the law. Before applying this information to a specific legal problem, the OSBA urges readers to seek advice from an attorney.
More Neighborhood News
Calendar of Events
- Susan Graham - 4/21/2014
- Prostate Cancer Awareness Ministry - 4/21/2014
- A New Adventure - 4/23/2014
- Jeri Holland - 4/23/2014
- Blue Man Group - 4/23/2014